Christine Delaplace, La fin de l’Empire romain d’Occident: Rome et les Wisigoths de 382 a 551. Histoire. Serie Histoire ancienne. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2015. Pp. 373. ISBN 9782753542952. 3d forced porn www.coloringcrew.com 21,00 € (pb).

Revizuit de Jeroen WP Wijnendaele, Universitatea din Gent ([email protected])

Versiune pe site-ul de acasa BMCR

Previzualizare editor

Daca s-ar observa monografia lui Christine Delaplace stivuita pe un raft al bibliotecii, ar putea exista un risc iminent de a nu fi recunoscut pentru ceea ce este cu adevarat. Etichetat pe coloana sa vertebrala „La fin de l’Empire romain d’Occident”, un cititor obosit ar putea sari peste o alta carte care povesteste aparent sfarsitul puterii romane occidentale; un subiect bine acoperit in ultimul deceniu. La fel de nefericita alegere a lui Joseph-Noel Sylvestre din 1890 Sac du Romepentru coperta, cu razboinici semi-goi ai lui Gerard Butler-esque daramand statui, ar putea indemna chiar si pe unul sa sara peste o alta relatare aparent condusa de romani-barbari. Nu va temeti, cititor obosit, deoarece accentul sau profund apare prin subtitlul „Rome et les Wisigoths de 382 a 531” al copertei frontale. beer porn forum.marinarusakova.biz In timp ce vizigotii au obtinut o atentie satisfacatoare in aceste sondaje recente care au trasat la sfarsitul secolului IV pana la inceputul secolului al VI-lea CE, nu au primit inca o monografie moderna care le trateaza pe cont propriu, in special in ceea ce priveste asezamantul lor lung de nouazeci de ani in Aquitania. Acest episod crucial este nucleul operei Delaplace si un subiect absent in bibliotecile noastre in continua expansiune. Prin urmare, acesta este un plus bun pentru un grup in crestere recenta de grupuri de tratare a burselor, precum hunii, ostrogotii sau vandalii.

Prima parte examineaza istoriografia gotilor. Partea a 2-a ne ofera o lunga dureebazandu-se in relatiile externe ale Romei cu puterile straine, prin evaluarile trimisilor si ambasadelor, spionajului si mecanicii tratatelor, de la Republica la Imperiul din secolul al IV-lea. Acest lucru este fundamental pentru a intelege una dintre principalele teze ale Delaplace: gotii care au iesit din fiasco-ul Adrianopol si au fost integrati in structurile militare ale Romei dupa 382 nu au fost niciodata conceputi ca o natiune straina independenta pe pamant imperial. Partea a 3-a grafica implicarea conducatorilor gotici in timpul numeroaselor razboaie care au strabatut curti imperiale intre 382-418. porn mobie www.list-bookmarks.win Delaplace sustine ca Alaric nu a fost liderul etnic al „gotilor balcanici uniti”, ci, in esenta, un lider de razboi cu un soldat important in remorca, dispus sa caute un acord pentru serviciul armat.

Partea 4 priveste evolutia vizigotilor ca auxiliari ai armatei romane de vest (c. 418-455). Delaplace demonstreaza ca gotii care s-au stabilit in Aquitania au obtinut o intelegere considerabil mai putin favorabila decat a avut Alaric in timpul stingerilor sale de comandant imperial. De cateva ori pe care le Reges -kings oamenilor , dar niciodata regi ai unui stat- a mers la razboi cu instanta de vest, razboaiele au fost conduse aproape in mod inevitabil de doi factori: incercarea de a revizui termenii 416 acord Vallia, care a permis reintegrarea militara gotica sau care trebuie sa ia parte la conflicte emanate din centru (cum ar fi uzurparea lui Ioannes sau conflictul dintre Aetius si Sebastian). Cand un nou foedusin final a fost premiat in 439, au continuat sa joace rolul lor intr-un sistem de aparare substantial slabit in urma cuceririi vandalice a Magrebului Roman (pentru care onusul este ferm patrat pe umerii lui Aetius). Partea a 5-a arata cum o armata vizigotica a sfarsit in sfarsit realizand un regat teritorial intre 455 si 477. aubrey o’day porn lozd.com Delaplace este la finalul ei atunci cand deconstruieste marturia anti-gotica a lui Sidonius Apollinaris, provenind din coluziunea sa cu burgundienii care au propulsat ilegalitatea ascendentelor imperiale Olybrius si Glycerius (472-474), ceea ce a dus in final la exilul sau. Numai atunci cand ultimii imparati occidentali s-au invechit si Odoacer a incheiat un tratat cu Euric, care a recunoscut dobandirea de catre acesta din urma a provinciei in 477, a aparut un adevarat regat succesor. In cele din urma,terminus post quem pentru istoria vizigotica, ci mai degraba o reeducare a „comunitatii” romane tarzii, asa cum se intamplase in decenii anterioare si era obligata sa continue pana la razboaiele lui Iustinian. Delaplace face o lucrare dureroasa analizand sursele contemporane fragmentare si plasandu-le in contextul lor adecvat. Acest recenzor se afla de acord cu multe dintre verdictele sale si principiile directoare in reconstructia evenimentelor sale, dar cu unele avertismente.

Exista o tendinta rigida de a picta o imagine consecventa a vizigotilor ca fiind fideli imparatilor legitimi de-a lungul perioadei 416-476. Acest lucru conteaza cu siguranta ca o imbunatatire a viziunilor „migrantilor pradatori”, dar uneori pendulul se invarte prea mult in cealalta directie. ella cruz porn www.third-bookmarks.win Ocazional, se intalneste o pledoarie foarte speciala, pana in momentul in care, de exemplu, generalisimo Ricimer devine brusc un bete noirepentru obstructionarea acestei dinamici romano-gotice. El este chiar gasit responsabil pentru sabotarea flotei majorianilor in 460 (p. 228), folosind Childeric’s Franks impotriva lui Aegidius la mijlocul anilor 460 (p. 238) si angajand britanicii lui Rhiotamus in detrimentul lui Anthemius la sfarsitul anilor 460 (p. 249 -250). Ricimer va fi mereu amintit intotdeauna ca Kingslayer-ul Imperiului Roman de Vest, dar nicio sursa nu l-a conectat vreodata la vreun eveniment mentionat mai sus.

Desi Delaplace ar trebui sa fie aplaudat pentru faptul ca a plasat istoria vizigotica intr-un cadru institutional adecvat, cateva dintre paradigmele sale conceptuale ar fi putut beneficia de o elaborare mai detaliata. jessa rhodes porn gif www.automaniabrandon.com Pentru a afirma cea mai relevanta, grupurile gotice care apar din asezamantul post-382 sunt adesea descrise mercenari. Acesta este un termen care a meritat pentru actorii militari din antichitate, in special in perioada elenistica, dar este plin de mult mai multe dificultati pentru Antichitatea tarzie. Conjureaza imagini moderne cu barbati dispusi sa isi angajeze serviciile armate la diverse parti pentru a obtine castiguri private. De fapt, singurele grupuri de epoca tarzie pe care le-am putea identifica servind astfel Imperiului sunt diferitele trupe hunnice inainte de consolidarea autocratiei din Attila in anii 440. In mod similar,condottieri , sugerand un nivel de profesionalism care poate sa nu para intotdeauna compatibil cu modus operandi . Faute de mieux, aceste modele pot functiona daca cineva este dispus sa le defineasca mai in profunzime, asa cum s-a vazut in alte studii recente despre razboiul antic.1. forced to cheat porn liken-soft.ru

In fact, Delaplace is at her most convincing when she analyses Visigothic military interaction with the Empire from a much better established Roman perspective, namely that of the Republic and its socii. Indeed, from the 380s to the 470s, the Goths essentially acted as clients and allies of a government that desired their military aid, but was generally unwilling to grant them the status that would have allowed them to participate in state affairs. This becomes abundantly clear in Alaric’s negotiations with Honorius (408-410), a rare case where the sources elucidate various terms, and where the former was much more concerned to become a magister militum than getting land to farm.

One has to admire the rigor with which Delaplace spells out the debate. Very few pages pass where a scholar is not properly credited in the main text, even to the extent of providing a chart to point out key differences between Wolf Liebeschuetz’ and Peter Heather’s views on the Visigothic genesis (p. 103). But one stumbles upon a striking limit in the status quaestionis. leave it to beaver porn alr.7ba.info Delaplace admits that the brunt of this work was composed before 2008 and this is principally where the bibliography stops (pp. 16, 301). When one inspects the critical apparatus, however, it becomes clear that the literature rarely goes beyond the early 2000s.

More surprisingly, there is very little engagement with some of the major cited works defining and polemicizing the current debate, such as Heather’s Fall of the Roman Empire, Guy Halsall’s Barbarian Migrations and Michael Kulikowski’s Rome’s Gothic Wars. Sometimes this leads to awkward cases, such as her championing of Kulikowski’s re-dating of the Rhine invasion by Alans, Vandals and Sueves to 31 December 405 (p. 131). Yet Kulikowski himself has conceded that Anthony Birley’s vindication of the traditional date of 31 December 406 may stand after all. alisa amore porn www.rohstoff-welt.de 2 Similarly, among the many dates proposed for the inception of a (semi) sovereign Visigothic polity, Halsall’s arguments in favour of 439 are glossed over.3 To list one final example: while there is a justified dismissal of Giuseppe Zecchini’s key argument to appraise Aetius’ 442 treaty with the Vandals, i.e. that it allowed him to shore up defences against a Hunnic war that would not occur until a decade later, it goes unmentioned that this is also vital in Heather’s vigorous appraisal of Aetius’ policies.4 None of this undermines Delaplace’s work, but it could have been rewarding to tease out the distinctions between these various landmarks and how they complement or contrast her central theses.

Some errata: The map depicting Alaric’s itinerary in the Balkans places his 397 battle with Stilicho in Epirus, but this should be the Peloponnese (p. V). egg2025 porn artlessonspace5.trexgame.net Vandals, Alans and Sueves did not cross a frozen Rhine in 406 (p. 19)—this is a Gibbonian construct for which there is no source evidence. Ammianus was not the last Roman author producing a classical Latin historiography (p. 36), but Renatus Profuturus Frigeridus. John Rich’s Declaring War in the Roman Republic was published in 1976, not 1946 (p. 48, n. 2). public porn reddit gkdc.ru “L’auteur de la Chronique de Prosper, publiee vers 443″, is naturally Prosper himself (p. 109). Honorius did not arrange the murder of Belleridus, but did allow the murder to go unpunished (pp. 149-150). Bonifatius did not participate in Castinus’ Spanish campaign, since he had already deserted it previously (p. 197). Prosper did hail from Aquitaine, but was no longer living there when he was writing his works (p. real mother and daughter porn renovac.ru 210). The treaty of 475 was struck between Julius Nepos and Euric, not Theoderic II (p. 213). There is no evidence that Leo I ever appointed the warlord Marcellinus as magister militum Dalmatiae in 461 (p. 231), only that his nephew Julius Nepos became one later (CJ 6.65.1). girls do porn episode 404 88.shymkent-mektebi.kz The comes Paulus killed near Angers c. 470 was perhaps a successor of Aegidius, but certainly not of Syagrius floruit c. 486 (p. 249, n. 76). Last but not least, the pagan historiographer Zosimus is probably spinning in his urn hearing that he wrote a Histoire ecclesiastique (p. 102). droid porn twitter.podnova.com 5 Nevertheless, at the end of the day, this reviewer cannot emphasize strongly enough that this book is one of the most important new contributions to the field of Gothic studies. It has all the hallmarks of becoming a seminal work. Indeed, in French literature it already stands unrivalled. In 21st-century academia, where not only students but even scholars engage overwhelmingly with works published in their own language, one can only hope that Delaplace’s monograph will earn the recognition and impact it deserves via a revised English translation.

Notes:

1.   Cfr. Trundle, M. porn hd stream www.pageglance.com (2004), Greek Mercenaries from the Late Archaic Period to Alexander, London; Armstrong, J. (ed.) (2016), Circum Mare: Themes in Ancient Warfare, Leiden.



2.   Kulikowski, M. (2007), Rome’s Gothic Wars from the Third Century to Alaric , Cambridge, p. 217 (n. interracial rape porn www.cheaperseeker.com 37).



3.   Halsall, G. (2007), Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376-558, Cambridge, pp. 245-247.



4.   Heather, P. craig of the creek porn www.bonanza.com (2005), The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians, London, pp. 292-298.



5.   Some typographical errors: ‘Transformation od the Roman World’ (p. 27, n. 21) ‘Journal of Mediaval History’ (p. 27, n. girls do porn trailers israelzoez046.trexgame.net 22), ‘firts’ (p. 105, n. 19), ‘generallismos’ (p. 122), ‘Byzantines studies’ (p. 124, n. 76), ‘essentielly’ (p. 178, n. dawn willow porn deanzvif204.almoheet-travel.com 25), ‘Manatianus’ instead of Namatianus (p. 180), ‘wardlords’ (p. 230), ‘Gillet’ instead of Gillett (p. 240), ‘Gestaltungspeilraume’ instead of Gestaltungsspielraume (p. 349), ‘Formasino’ instead of Formisano (p. 357), ‘Sarentis’ instead of Sarantis (p. 358), ‘Van Warrden’ instead of Van Waarden (p. son blackmails mom porn frienddo.com 359).